This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shapiro, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shapiro, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 64, Issue 1 95-103, Copyright © 1982 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Ollier's Disease. An assessment of angular deformity, shortening, and pathological fracture in twenty-one patients

F Shapiro

A retrospective review of twenty-one patients with Ollier's disease showed that the lesion involved the femur and tibia most frequently, and that those bones accounted for the large majority of clinical problems. Angular deformities were common; 80 per cent of the affected femora had clinically significant varus or valgus angulation in the distal part and 42 per cent of the affected tibiae had proximal or distal deformity. The apex of the angulation, when present, was metaphyseal, with the concavity on the side that was more extensively involved by the enchondromas. Osteotomies were done frequently to correct angulation; all healed well. Deformity in the distal part of the femur frequently required repeat osteotomy to achieve a straight bone at skeletal maturity, The extent of shortening, which always was present in the involved limb, closely paralleled the extent of involvement, The discrepancies in limb lengths prior to surgical treatment averaged 9.8 centimeters (range, 4.3 to 35.7 centimeters). Epiphyseal arrest, when appropriately timed, was effective in correcting or limiting the discrepancies, but partial (medial or lateral) epiphyseal arrest to correct angular deformity was ineffective. Diaphyseal lengthening was done on six occasions, once in the femur and five times in the tibia and fibula, with good results. Fourteen pathological fractures occurred in seven of the twenty-one patients, and all healed uneventfully with conservative treatment.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
B. K. Potter, B. A. Freedman, R. A. Lehman Jr., S. B. Shawen, T. R. Kuklo, and M. D. Murphey
Solitary Epiphyseal Enchondromas
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2005; 87(7): 1551 - 1560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. G. GABOS and J. R. BOWEN
Epiphyseal-Metaphyseal Enchondromatosis. A New Clinical Entity
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 1998; 80(6): 782 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text]