This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Papaioannou, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kenwright, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Papaioannou, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kenwright, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 64, Issue 1 59-62, Copyright © 1982 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Scoliosis associated with limb-length inequality

T Papaioannou, I Stokes and J Kenwright

We reviewed the records and physical findings of twenty-three young adults who had had significant untreated limb-length inequality, present since childhood. The spine was studied radiographically and clinically before and after neutralization of the discrepancy of limb lengths with a lift. Movements of the spine also were measured. A significant asymmetry of lateral flexion of the spine remained in nearly all of the patients after neutralization of the discrepancy. The lumbar scoliosis associated with the limb-length inequality was compensatory and non-progressive, but abnormalities of the Cobb angle and of axial rotation remained in the young adults. No relationship was found between the underlying cause of the anisomelia or its duration and the severity of the spinal abnormality. The scoliosis was minor in patients with discrepancies of less than 2.2 centimeters. No patients complained of significant discomfort in the back, nor were degenerative radiographic changes evident there.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
B. A. Rothbart
Relationship of functional leg-length discrepancy to abnormal pronation.
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, November 1, 2006; 96(6): 499 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
S. Curran
Relationship of Functional Leg-Length Discrepancy to Abnormal Pronation: Commentary
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, November 1, 2006; 96(6): 505 - 506.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. M. SONG, S. E. HALLIDAY, and D. G. LITTLE
The Effect of Limb-Length Discrepancy on Gait
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 1997; 79(11): 1690 - 8.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. J. STIRLING, D. HOWEL, P. A. MILLNER, S.'A SADIQ, D. SHARPLES, and R. A. DICKSON
Late-Onset Idiopathic Scoliosis in Children Six to Fourteen Years Old. A Cross-Sectional Prevalence Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 1996; 78(9): 1330 - 6.
[Abstract] [Full Text]