This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nashold, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bright, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nashold, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bright, D. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 64, Issue 1 1-10, Copyright © 1982 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Long-term pain control by direct peripheral-nerve stimulation

BS Nashold, JL Goldner, JB Mullen and DS Bright

In 1970, we began implanting electrodes for prolonged stimulation of injured peripheral nerves to reduce chronic pain. Thirty-eight peripheral nerves in thirty-five patients have been stimulated with electrodes for a period ranging from four to nine years. Nineteen electrode systems were implanted in the upper extremity (eleven on the median nerve, six on the ulnar nerve, one on the median and ulnar nerves, and one on the median and radial nerves), with successful relief of pain in 52..6 per cent of the patients. Sixteen stimulators have been implanted on the sciatic nerve with a success rate for pain relief of 31 per cent. Failures in the lower extremity were found primarily in lesions of the posterior tibial nerve at the ankle. We speculate that the stress of weight-bearing and the anatomical position of the posterior tibial nerve may partially account for this rate of failure. Use of the electrode-implant systems required careful preoperative assessment by an experienced team, meticulous technique, and a mechanical system that tolerates stress. The location and characteristics of the lesion affect the response to electrical stimulation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. Shin and D. Ring
The Ulnar Nerve in Elbow Trauma
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2007; 89(5): 1108 - 1116.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
J. E. Jensen, R. R. Conn, G. Hazelrigg, and J. E. Hewett
The use of transcutaneous neural stimulation and isokinetic testing in arthroscopic knee surgery
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1985; 13(1): 27 - 33.
[Abstract] [PDF]