This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Santore, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scott, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Santore, R. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 63, Issue 4 536-544, Copyright © 1981 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Unicondylar unicompartmental replacement for osteoarthritis of the knee

RD Scott and RF Santore

Unicompartmental knee replacement is an attractive concept that offers several potential advantages over bicompartmental or tricompartmental replacement, including preservation of bone stock, of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments, of the patellofemoral joint, and of the normal opposite compartment. Of our first 100 consecutive knees that had unicompartmental arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and were followed for two to six years (average, three and one-half years), eighty-eight were medial and twelve were lateral replacements. The ages of the patients at the time of operation ranged from forty-six to eighty-five years, with an average age of seventy-one years. At follow-up, pain relief was good to excellent in 92 per cent of the knees. The average amount of flexion was 114 degrees (range, 90 to 140 degrees); one-half of the knees had at least 120 degrees of flexion. The average flexion contracture was 1 degree. There were no infections and no peroneal palsies. At the time of writing, three failures had required revision. Radiolucent lines at the bone-cement interface were present around 8 per cent of the femoral components and 27 per cent of the tibial components. Two femoral components subsided in obese patients. There was no tibial loosening in the series. The most common complications, per anserinus bursitis, occurred in 12 per cent of the knees and was treated satisfactorily by injection of local anesthetics and steroids. Surgical technique must be precise to prevent subluxation of the tibia on the femur due to either improper positioning of the components or too tight a fit (too much pressure) between them. We view unicompartmental replacement as an attractive alternative for the treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis in elderly patients. However, we are strong advocates of proximal tibial osteotomy for unicompartmental osteoarthritis associated with a varus deformity in selected patients.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. P. Sah and R. D. Scott
Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Through a Medial Approach. Study with an Average Five-Year Follow-up
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2007; 89(9): 1948 - 1954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. Slover, B. Espehaug, L. I. Havelin, L. B. Engesaeter, O. Furnes, I. Tomek, and A. Tosteson
Cost-Effectiveness of Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty in Elderly Low-Demand Patients. A Markov Decision Analysis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2006; 88(11): 2348 - 2355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. A. Berger, R. M. Meneghini, J. J. Jacobs, M. B. Sheinkop, C. J. Della Valle, A. G. Rosenberg, and J. O. Galante
Results of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at a Minimum of Ten Years of Follow-up
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2005; 87(5): 999 - 1006.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. J. Howe, O. D. Taunton Jr., and G. A. Engh
Retained Cement After Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty. A Report of Four Cases
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2004; 86(10): 2283 - 2286.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. Naudie, J. Guerin, D. A. Parker, R. B. Bourne, and C. H. Rorabeck
Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with the Miller-Galante Prosthesis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2004; 86(9): 1931 - 1935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]