This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nagel, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Perkash, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nagel, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Perkash, I.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 63, Issue 1 62-70, Copyright © 1981 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc

JOURNAL CONTENTS

Stability of the upper lumbar spine following progressive disruptions and the application of individual internal and external fixation devices

DA Nagel, TA Koogle, RL Piziali and I Perkash

Five fresh human cadavera were tested to determine range-of-motion measurements at the interspace of the first and second lumbar vertebrae after progressive disruption of the joint followed by internal and external stabilization. The disruption progressed from posterior to anterior, leaving the anterior longitudinal ligament and anterior part of the annulus fibrosus intact. Flexion-extension range of motion was most sensitive to progressive disruptions and was significant following disruption of the facets. The Taylor-Knight brace was effective for limiting lateral motion, fair for limiting flexion-extension, and not effective for rotation. The three-point hyperextension brace was fairly effective for flexion-extension only. The body cast was effective in limiting all motions. Wire loops partially cut through the spinous processes in all cases with extreme flexion. Harrington distraction rods were effective in limiting motion if under proper tension, but they dislodged in three of the five specimens. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Data from this study show that flexion of the second lumbar vertebra on the first of 20 degrees or a lateral bend of 10 degrees seen on a routine roentgenogram without vertebral fracture indicates that all posterior ligaments and at least part of the annulus fibrosus must be disrupted. Because internal fixation failed on occasion, we strongly urge the use of external fixation and careful mobilization of the patient to prevent flexion and rotation if internal stabilization is used for disruptions of the upper lumbar spine. The body cast was the most effective in limiting motion of the external fixation devices tested.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?