This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Freeland, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Westin, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Freeland, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Westin, G. W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 62, Issue 8 1351-1361, Copyright © 1980 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc

JOURNAL CONTENTS

Greater trochanteric hip arthroplasty in children with loss of the femoral head

AE Freeland, DJ Sullivan and GW Westin

In seventeen children with catastrophic loss of the femoral head, the hip was salvaged by greater trochanteric arthroplasty. The average follow-up of these patients was eleven years, and fourteen patients were followed to skeletal maturity or longer. In Group I, consisting of four patients with greater trochanteric arthroplasty alone, good initial stability gradually deteriorated as subluxation occurred, accompanied by a proportionate return of abductor limp, loss of hip motion, and an increased rate of degenerative changes in the joint. Group II, consisting of eight patients who had either acetabuloplasty or innominate osteotomy in addition to greater trochanteric arthroplasty, had only slightly improved hip containment and results similar to those in Group I. Spontaneous ankylosis of the hip occurred in six of the patients in those two groups. The best results were obtained in five patients in Groups III and IV who had the procedure supplemented by proximal femoral varus osteotomy.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?