This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Sherman, F. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by White, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Sherman, F. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 62, Issue 6 928-932, Copyright © 1980 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

The hip-shelf procedure. A long-term evaluation

RE White and FC Sherman

Renewed interest in the hip-shelf procedure as a solution to the dysplastic acetabulum in the older child stimulated an evaluation of the long-term results in an effort to clarify the role of this procedure. Only patients with a minimum of ten years of follow-up were evaluated in the study. The average follow-up for the entire series of twenty-nine hips in twenty-seven patients was twenty-two years and ten months. At evaluation, pain was present in fifteen hips, a limp was present in twenty-five, and degenerative changes were present in twenty hips. Complications occurred in twenty-one hips and additional operative procedures were required in fourteen hips. Twenty-one of the twenty-nine hips were evaluated by us, with an average follow-up of twenty-five years and eight months. One hip was rated as excellent; eight, as satisfactory; and twelve, as poor. Although the hip-shelf procedure has been described as a safe, conservative, and reliable approach to the problem of a dysplastic acetabulum, our long-term results suggest a more cautious view of the use of this procedure. We recommend consideration of other stabilizing procedures for the dysplastic acetabulum.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
E. Fawzy, G. Mandellos, R. De Steiger, P. McLardy-Smith, M. K. D. Benson, and D. Murray
Is there a place for shelf acetabuloplasty in the management of adult acetabular dysplasia?: A SURVIVORSHIP STUDY
J Bone Joint Surg Br, September 1, 2005; 87-B(9): 1197 - 1202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
J. Sanchez-Sotelo, R. T. Trousdale, D. J. Berry, and M. E. Cabanela
Surgical Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Adults: I. Nonarthroplasty Options
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., September 1, 2002; 10(5): 321 - 333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. Leunig, K. A. Siebenrock, and R. Ganz
Rationale of Periacetabular Osteotomy and Background Work
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2001; 83(3): 438 - 438.
[Full Text]