This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teitz, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Frankel, V. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Teitz, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Frankel, V. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 62, Issue 5 770-776, Copyright © 1980 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Problems associated with tibial fractures with intact fibulae

CC Teitz, DR Carter and VH Frankel

Of twenty-three patients more than twenty years old who were treated for a tibial shaft fracture without a concomitant fibular fracture, six (26 per cent) had delayed union or non-union and six (26 per cent) had varus malunion of the fractured tibia. Pain and roentgenographic changes developed in the ipsilateral ankle within two years of injury in two of these six patients with malunion. Of forty-five patients less than twenty years old with similar fractures, one had delayed union and twelve (27 per cent) had varus malunion. Pain in the ipsilateral ankle was observed in two of these twelve patients with malunion. In addition, a bent fibula was observed in thirteen patients who incurred their fractures when they were less than twenty but in no patients who were more than twenty years old at the time of fracture. Clinical observations were corroborated by biomechanical studies on an experimental model. These studies suggested that when the fibula remains intact, a tibiofibular length discrepancy develops and causes altered strain patterns in the tibia and fibula. These may lead to delayed union, non-union, or malunion of the tibia with the sequelae of joint disturbances. The lower incidence of complications in patients less than twenty years old may be due to the greater compliance of their fibulae and soft tissues.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
R. P. Mashru, M. J. Herman, and P. D. Pizzutillo
Tibial Shaft Fractures in Children and Adolescents
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., September 1, 2005; 13(5): 345 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
S. F. Martinez and G. A. Murphy
Tibial Stress Fracture in a Male Ballet Dancer: A Case Report
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2005; 33(1): 124 - 130.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. Kumar, S. J. Charlebois, E. L. Cain, R. A. Smith, A. U. Daniels, and J. M. Crates
Effect of Fibular Plate Fixation on Rotational Stability of Simulated Distal Tibial Fractures Treated with Intramedullary Nailing
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 31, 2003; 85(4): 604 - 608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]