This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mital, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mital, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 62, Issue 5 732-739, Copyright © 1980 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

The so-called unresolved Osgood-Schlatter lesion: a concept based on fifteen surgically treated lesions

MA Mital, RA Matza and J Cohen

Of 118 patients with 151 knees treated for Osgood-Schlatter disease, fourteen patients (fifteen knees) had a distinct and separate ossicle at the proximal aspect of the tibial tubercle. This ossicle appeared after the child was first seen in all but three of the fifteen knees. When the ossicle failed to unite with the tubercle, the non-union was associated with local discomfort during activity and when direct pressure was applied on the tubercle. The symptoms did not respond to conservative treatment for an average of 3.8 years. Resection of the ossicle along with the adjacent bursa was followed by prompt relief of symptoms. Histological studies showed no evidence of avascularity. All ossicles were attached to the distal part of the undersurface of the ligamentum patellae and were separated from the tubercle by a bursa or scar tissue. The findings strongly support the concept that avulsion of the proximal cartilaginous part of the tibial tubercle is the cause of Osgood-Schlatter disease and they also suggest that once a separate ossicle is formed and becomes symptomatic, surgical excision is necessary to relieve the symptoms.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. Ishida, R. Kuroda, K. Sato, T. Iguchi, M. Doita, M. Kurosaka, and T. Yamamoto
Infrapatellar Bursal Osteochondromatosis Associated with Unresolved Osgood-Schlatter Disease. A Case Report
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2005; 87(12): 2780 - 2783.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
U. M. Kujala, M. Kvist, and O. Heinonen
Osgood-Schlatter's disease in adolescent athletes: Retrospective study of incidence and duration
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1985; 13(4): 236 - 241.
[Abstract] [PDF]