This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moskowitz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Binner, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moskowitz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Binner, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 62, Issue 3 364-376, Copyright © 1980 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Long-term follow-up of scoliosis fusion

A Moskowitz, JH Moe, RB Winter and H Binner

One hundred and ten scoliotic patients underwent correction and spine fusion by one of us (J. H. M.) at Gillette Children's Hospital between 1947 and 1957. Sixty-one of these patients were evaluated in 1977 for this follow-up study. The evaluation consisted of physical and roentgenographic examination, photographs, and a detailed psychosocial analysis. The aims of the study were to evaluate: (1) the long-term stability of the fusion; (2) the incidence and severity of low-back pain; and (3) the degree of integration of the patient into society. The results showed that a solid fusion had no significant loss of correction with time. Eighty-four per cent of the patients lost only zero to 5 degrees of correction during an average follow-up of twenty-six years. Low-back pain was found to be no more frequent than in the normal population in this age group, and there was less low-back pain than in a comparable series of scoliotic patients without fusion. There was no correlation between the occurrence of low-back pain and the length or magnitude of the fused curve or the lowest extent of the fusion. An unexpected finding was the high incidence of neck pain, the cause of which is unknown. Psychosocial analysis revealed that the patients were productive, active, stable persons who were working and contributing members of society.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
B. K. Potter, L. G. Lenke, and T. R. Kuklo
Prevention and Management of Iatrogenic Flatback Deformity
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2004; 86(8): 1793 - 1808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. A. Mertz, B. P. Yawn, R. A. Yawn, S. J. Jacobsen, W. J. Shaughnessy, D. Hodge, and D. Ilstrup
School-Based Scoliosis Screening
JAMA, April 5, 2000; 283(13): 1689 - 1689.
[Full Text] [PDF]