This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prietto, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prietto, C. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 61, Issue 3 425-428, Copyright © 1979 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Supracondylar fractures of the humerus. A comparative study of Dunlop's traction versus percutaneous pinning

CA Prietto

A retrospective comparative study was done of two groups of patients with displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus. The patients in the first group were treated with Dunlop's traction, while those in the second group were treated by percutaneous pin fixation. There were thirty-six patients in the group treated with Dunlop's traction, of whom twenty-seven were seen in follow-up with an average time of 2.7 years. Twenty-eight patients were in the group treated with pin fixation, of whom twenty were seen in follow-up with an average time of 2.9 years. In each case the chart and roentgenograms were reviewed and the patient was examined. The results showed a 33 per cent incidence of cubitus varus (so-called gunstock deformity) in the patients treated with Dunlop's traction as compared with 5 per cent in those pinned percutaneously. The range of elbow motion was also slightly better in the group treated with pin fixation. Furthermore, the costs and hospital stays were significantly less in those treated by pinning. Complications in both groups were few.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. Omid, P. D. Choi, and D. L. Skaggs
Supracondylar Humeral Fractures in Children
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2008; 90(5): 1121 - 1132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
A. Gadgil, C. Hayhurst, N. Maffulli, and J. S. M. Dwyer
Elevated, straight-arm traction for supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children
J Bone Joint Surg Br, January 1, 2005; 87-B(1): 82 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]