This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pellicci, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pellicci, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, H. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 61, Issue 1 28-36, Copyright © 1979 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Mechanical failures in total hip replacement requiring reoperation

PM Pellicci, EA Salvati and HJ Robinson

During the years 1971 through mid-1977, approximately 3,000 total hip replacements were performed at The Hospital for Special Surgery using metal-to-plastic prostheses. During that period of time, thirty-five operations were done for mechanical failure in the absence of infection. The mechanical failures were distributed as follows: Fourteen patients had dislocations of the prostheses and seven patients had loosening of the femoral component, mostly with varus positioning of the femoral stem. Six patients, most of them heavy, active men, had fractures of the femoral stem. Three patients had loosening of the acetabular component. (In two of three there was insufficient bone stock over the acetabulum.) Four patients had proximal migration of the greater trochanter and one had a fracture-dislocation of the acetabulum. In all cases a technical or anatomical problem could be identified as the reason for mechanical failure necessitating reoperation. By careful preoperative planning, proper selection of procedures and positioning of prostheses, bone-grafting when necessary, and stricter attention to the technique of using cement, we could conceivably have avoided two-thirds of these failures.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
B. D. Springer, D. J. Berry, M. E. Cabanela, A. D. Hanssen, and D. G. Lewallen
Early Postoperative Transverse Pelvic Fracture: A New Complication Related to Revision Arthroplasty with an Uncemented Cup
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2005; 87(12): 2626 - 2631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. M. Cook, P. M. Pellicci, and H. G. Potter
Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of an Occult Fracture of the Femoral Component After Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Case Report
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2004; 86(1): 149 - 153.
[Full Text] [PDF]