This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WERNER, F.
Right arrow Articles by MURRAY, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by WERNER, F.
Right arrow Articles by MURRAY, D. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1978;60:342-348.
© 1978 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


The Influence of Design on the Transmission of Torque across Knee Prostheses

FREDERICK WERNER M. MECH. ENG.1, DAVID FOSTER B.S.1, and DAVID G. MURRAY M.D.1

1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, State University of New York, Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse

Knee prostheses of eight different designs were tested experimentally to determine the axial torque necessary to rotate the tibial component relative to the femoral component with the prosthesis positioned at or near full extension. The results represent transmitted torque as a function of axial rotation. For six designs, the transmitted torque was 11.3 newtonmeters (100 inch-pounds) or greater at 6 degrees of rotation, with an axial load of 1556.8 newtons (350 pounds). These prostheses either had close conformation between femoral and tibial components, or were mechanically linked. In these prostheses, the geometry of the articulating surfaces was the primary determinant of torque. For the other two types, under similar loading conditions the transmitted torques were 2.5 newton-meters (twenty-two inch-pounds) at 6 degrees of rotation. These prostheses were designed to allow greater freedom for rotation, and hence for them the primary determinant of torque was friction between the articulating surfaces. The predictive value of this torque characteristic relative to the incidence of loosening will have to be determined by comparison with clinical experience.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
C. J. Vertullo, M. E. Easley, W. N. Scott, and J. N. Insall
Mobile Bearings in Primary Knee Arthroplasty
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., November 1, 2001; 9(6): 355 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]