This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feiwell, E.
Right arrow Articles by Blatt, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feiwell, E.
Right arrow Articles by Blatt, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 60, Issue 2 169-173, Copyright © 1978 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

The effect of hip reduction on function in patients with myelomeningocele. Potential gains and hazards of surgical treatment

E Feiwell, D Sakai and T Blatt

We studied seventy-six patients with myelomeningocele who were more than five years old and ahd had no hip surgery during the two previous years. Of these seventy-six patients, forty-one had had no operative treatment intended to reduce the dislocation of their hips and thirty-five had been operated on one or more times to reduce or maintain reduction of one or both hips. The presence of the femoral head in the acetabulum did not improve range of hip motion or ability to walk, nor did it reduce the amount of bracing required or decrease pain. The complications of surgical treatment to gain reduction were numerous and included failure to obtain stability in 40 per cent of the hips, loss of hip motion, and fractures. A level pelvis and a good range of hip motion were found to be more important for function than reduction of the hips. The goal of treatment should be maximum function, not roentgenographic reduction of the dislocated hip.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
W. B. GREENE
Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons - Treatment of Hip and Knee Problems in Myelomeningocele*{{dagger}}
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 1998; 80(7): 1068 - 82.
[Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
L. L. TOSI, B. D. BUCK, S. S. NASON, and D. W. MCKAY
Dislocation of the Hip in Myelomeningocele. The McKay Hip Stabilization
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 1996; 78(5): 664 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text]