This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cunha, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Quintiliani, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cunha, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Quintiliani, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 59, Issue 7 856-859, Copyright © 1977 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

The penetration characteristics of cefazolin, cephalothin, and cephradine into bone in patients undergoing total hip replacement

BA Cunha, HR Gossling, HS Pasternak, CH Nightingale and R Quintiliani

Preoperatively, to prevent infection, seventy-one patients who were to have total hip arthroplasty were given one gram of cephalothin, cephradine, or cefazolin intravenously. Simultaneous samples of bone and serum were obtained after various time intervals and assayed for cephalosporin concentration to correlate the antibiotic concentrations in these sites with time. Of the cephalosporins tested, cefazolin achieved the highest total peak levels in bone (thirty micrograms per gram), followed in descending order by cephradine (twenty-three micrograms per gram) and cephalothin (2.8 micrograms per gram). These peak levels in bone, reached twenty-five to forty minutes after injection, were sixty, 6.7, and fifteen times higher than the usual mean minimum inhibitory concentrations of cefazolin, cephradine, and cephalothin, respectively, for penicillin-resistant staphylococci. The half-lives of the antibiotics in bone were forty-two, forty, and thirty minutes, respectively.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
L. Prokuski
Prophylactic Antibiotics in Orthopaedic Surgery
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., May 1, 2008; 16(5): 283 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. J. J. METER, M. D. W. POLLY JR., L. C. R. P. BRUECKNER, M. J. J. TENUTA, L. ASPLUND, and W. J. HOPKINSON
Effect of Intraoperative Blood Loss on the Serum Level of Cefazolin in Patients Managed with Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Prospective, Controlled Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 1996; 78(8): 1201 - 5.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
S. V Moran, F. Montiel, G. Acuna, J. Vergara, M. J Irarrazaval, G. Maturana, and J. Dubernet
Cephradine and cefazolin plasma levels during cardiac surgery
Perfusion, January 1, 1986; 1(1): 41 - 45.
[Abstract] [PDF]