This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Srinivasan, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Srinivasan, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 58, Issue 6 777-785, Copyright © 1976 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Patterns of movement of totally intrinsic-minus fingers based on a study of one hundred and forty-one fingers

H Srinivasan

A detailed study of metacarpophalangeal flexion and interphalangeal extension movements of 141 fingers with complete intrinsic-muscle paralysis due to leprosy showed that long flexors and long extensors produce movement at the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints simultaneously, and not successively as is generally believed. The amounts of flexion resulting from long flexor activity are almost equal at the two joints and metacarpophalangeal flexion is achieved without excessive flexion of the proximal interphalangeal joint, but this is masked by the claw-finger deformity. The movement resulting from activity of the long extensor is complex and there are three or more qualitatively different patterns of extension. Although the long extensor produces simultaneous extension at the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints, the latter consistently lags behind the former so that full extension is not achieved at the proximal interphalangeal joint even when the metacarpophalangeal joint is maximally extended. The diverse patterns of extension are not related to duration of degree of clawing or to any particular finger.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?