This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beckenbaugh, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bryan, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beckenbaugh, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bryan, R. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 58, Issue 4 483-487, Copyright © 1976 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Review and analysis of silicone-rubber metacarpophalangeal implants

RD Beckenbaugh, JH Dobyns, RL Linscheid and RS Bryan

A series of 530 consecutive arthroplasties using silicone-rubber implants in 119 patients was reviewed. Clinical and roentgenographic evaluations were completed on sixty patients and 254 implants, with an average follow-up of two and a half years; the remaining fifty-nine patients were evaluated by questionnaire. All but three patients had rheumatoid disease, usually with severe deformity, and many of the patients underwent other procedures on the upper extremity; these procedures often precluded early motion after the arthroplasties. Three prostheses (0.6 per cent) were removed because of infection, and reoperation was required in 2.4 per cent of the joints. Detailed clinical follow-up of 254 prostheses revealed the following: for Swanson prosthesis-average motion 38 degrees, fracture rate 26.2 per cent, and recurrence of clinical deformity 11.3 per cent; for Neibauer prostheses-average motion 35 degrees, fracture rate 38.2 per cent, and recurrence of clinical deformity 44.1 per cent. It should be noted that use of early implant types and some variations from the designer's recommended rehabilitation protocols were features of this series.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
M. Rizzo and R. D Beckenbaugh
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., March 1, 2007; 15(3): 189 - 197.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
T. D. Rozental
Reconstruction of the Rheumatoid Thumb
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., February 1, 2007; 15(2): 118 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. Chiari, K. Trieb, C. A. Goldfarb, and P. J. Stern
Metacarpophalangeal Joint Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis * C.A. Goldfarb and P.J. Stern reply
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2004; 86(8): 1832 - 1833.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. A. Goldfarb and P. J. Stern
Metacarpophalangeal Joint Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Long-Term Assessment
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2003; 85(10): 1869 - 1878.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
J. A. Abboud, P. K. Beredjiklian, and D. J. Bozentka
Metacarpophalangeal Joint Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., May 1, 2003; 11(3): 184 - 191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. D. COOK, R. D. BECKENBAUGH, J. REDONDO, L. S. POPICH, J. J. KLAWITTER, and R. L. LINSCHEID
Long-Term Follow-up of Pyrolytic Carbon Metacarpophalangeal Implants
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 1999; 81(5): 635 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text]