This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Letts, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bobecko, W. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Letts, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bobecko, W. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 57, Issue 5 616-619, Copyright © 1975 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Preoperative skeletal traction in scoliosis

RM Letts, G Palakar and WP Bobecko

To determine the role of preoperative traction in the treatment of spinal curves, ten patients with curves averaging 81 degrees by the Cobb measurement were studied. Each patient was treated in traction by means of a halo or skull tongs and femoral pins for two to three weeks prior to the surgical correction of the scoliosis with instrumentation. Weights were added to the traction apparatus, 1.8 kilograms a day, to a maximum of 18.1 kilograms. Pretraction supine roentgenograms were compared with supine roentgenograms made at three-day intervals throughout the traction period. Preoperative traction resulted in an average improvement of the curves of 34 degrees, or 41 per cent of the initial curve. Most of the correction was obtained within the first week of traction. Further correction during surgery with Harrington instrumentation yielded 13.5 degrees on the average (16 per cent) so that combined correction averaged 47 degrees, or 57 per cent.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. M. Buchowski, D. L. Skaggs, and P. D. Sponseller
Temporary Internal Distraction as an Aid to Correction of Severe Scoliosis. Surgical Technique
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2007; 89(2_suppl_2): 297 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. M. Buchowski, R. Bhatnagar, D. L. Skaggs, and P. D. Sponseller
Temporary Internal Distraction as an Aid to Correction of Severe Scoliosis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2006; 88(9): 2035 - 2041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]