This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CARR, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by WINGO, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by CARR, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by WINGO, C. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1973;55:690-700.
© 1973 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


Fractures of the Femoral Diaphysis

A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF THE RESULTS AND COSTS OF TREATMENT BY INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING AND BY TRACTION AND A SPICA CAST

CHALMERS R. CARR M.D.1 and CHARLES H. WINGO M.D.1

1 From the Miller Clinic and the Charlotte Memorial Hospital, Charlotte

One hundred and sixty femoral shaft fractures (in 154 patients) all treated in the same hospital, seventy-seven by early Kuntscher nailing and eighty three by traction and a spica cast, were studied retrospectively and the costs of treatment were analyzed and projected for the future. Twenty-nine per cent of the patients treated by traction and a cast had complications all requiring surgical treatment, mostly by secondary nailing. Including primary and secondary nailings, there were nineteen complications after 100 nailings. Of these complications, three were major infections and four were fracture healing problems. The healing time was less in the closed group, but the time in the hospital and time to return to work were less in the nailed group. The cost of care both now and projected was 20 to 30 per cent less for open reduction and nailing. It was concluded that open treatment has decided advantages despite the risks of infection.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?