This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MURRAY, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by ZUEGE, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MURRAY, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by ZUEGE, R. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1972;54:237-256.
© 1972 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


Kinesiologic Measurements of Functional Performance Before and After McKee-Farrar Total Hip Replacement

A STUDY OF THIRTY PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS, OSTEOARTHRITIS, OR AVASCULAR NECROSIS OF THE FEMORAL HEAD

M. P. MURRAY PH.D.1, BRUCE J. BREWER M.D.1, and ROBERT C. ZUEGE M.D.1

1 From the Kinesiology Research Laboratory, Veterans Administration Center, Wood: the Department of Orthopedic Surgery and the Division of Physical Therapy, The Medical College of Wisconsin (formerly Marquette School of Medicine), Milwaukee

Measurements of the functional performance of thirty patients with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and avascular necrosis of the femoral head were made before and three and six months following McKee-Farrar total hip replacement and were then compared. The measurements included: range of hip motion, hip abductor and adductor muscle torque, position of the center of pressure of the supportive force during standing, amplitude of force applied to assistive devices during walking, and ten previously described components of walking performance. The measurements were also compared with normal standards. Finally, roentgenographic evaluations and the patients' ratings of the surgical result were analyzed.

Twenty-seven of the thirty patients were considered to have pronounced improvement on the basis of the functional tests and the subjective ratings. One patient, who had a severe staphylococcal wound infection, became much worse in every component of function. The remaining two patients who did not show satisfactory improvement were: a patient with chronic alcoholism who was totally uncooperative throughout the postoperative course and a patient who had a series of postoperative complications which were unrelated to his hip replacement.

The quantitative values presented in this study provide a basis for comparing the functional performance following other major reconstructive procedures on the hip.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
M. Perron, F. Malouin, and H. Moffet
Assessing advanced locomotor recovery after total hip arthroplasty with the timed stair test
Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2003; 17(7): 780 - 786.
[Abstract] [PDF]