This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MOE, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by KETTLESON, D. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MOE, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by KETTLESON, D. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1970;52:1509-1533.
© 1970 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


Idiopathic Scoliosis

ANALYSIS OF CURVE PATTERNS AND THE PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF MILWAUKEE- BRACE TREATMENT IN ONE HUNDRED SIXTY-NINE PATIENTS

JOHN H. MOE M.D.1 and DAVID N. KETTLESON M.D.1

1 From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota Health Science Center, Minneapolis

A retrospective study is reported of 228 major idiopathic curves in 169 patients who had either completed Milwaukee-brace treatment (132) or were wearing the brace at night only during the weaning process (thirty-seven). The data collected and analyzed included the history, initial and final physical findings, roentgenograms of the spinal deformity, and the curves as determined at different evaluation times during and after treatment.

The findings and conclusions were as follows:

1. Major curves occurred in three distinct areas: high thoracic (seventh cervical to the seventh thoracic vertebra), thoracic (third thoracic to the third lumbar vertebra), and lumbar (tenth thoracic to the fifth lumbar vertebra).

2. The median total brace-wearing time was 34.4 months.

3. The best correction was obtained within the first twenty-five months in 97 per cent and within two and one-half years in all patients.

4. The high thoracic curves gave the poorest response; the thoracic and lumbar, the best.

5. The median loss of correction after removal of the brace was 1 per cent in thoracic curves and 5 per cent in lumbar curves.

6. The best response to brace treatment occurred when treatment was begun before the iliac epiphyses were capped.

7. Longer curves corrected best.

8. Only one curve of less than 40 degrees at the start of brace treatment was surgically corrected (the patient was uncooperative).

9. Since small curves treated in a Milwaukee brace may show-little or no final correction, these curves lower the percentage of correction at end-result evaluation. Nonetheless, the correction in these curves should be classified as satisfactory because the curves were not allowed to progress.

10. Some of the larger (45 to 50 degrees) double major curves of the right thoracic left lumbar variety showed no roentgenographic improvement but still demonstrated substantial cosmetic improvement with better balance and lessening of the rib prominence. Thus, the improvement produced by the brace is not necessarily demonstrable in a quantitative fashion. Factors 9 and 10 were not considered in this analysis.

11. Severe deformities in some young patients were kept from progressing or were even improved so that necessary surgery could be safely delayed until a more desirable age for operation was reached.

12. The best results were obtained when there was full cooperation by the patient.

13. Study of a greater number of patients who have completed their Milwaukeebrace treatment program and have been followed long enough to evaluate the final result is necessary.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. J. O'Neill, L. A. Karol, M. K. Shindle, E. E. Elerson, K. M. Brintzenhofeszoc, D. E. Katz, K. W. Farmer, and P. D. Sponseller
Decreased Orthotic Effectiveness in Overweight Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2005; 87(5): 1069 - 1074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. G. Gabos, J. A. Bojescul, J. R. Bowen, K. Keeler, and L. Rich
Long-Term Follow-up of Female Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis Treated with the Wilmington Orthosis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2004; 86(9): 1891 - 1899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. B. Winter, J. E. Lonstein, K. J. Noonan, S. L. Weinstein, W. C. Jacobson, and L. A. Dolan
Correspondence
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 1997; 79(6): 954-a - 5.
[Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. M. ROBINSON and M. J. MCMASTER
Juvenile Idiopathic Scoliosis. Curve Patterns and Prognosis in One Hundred and Nine Patients
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 1996; 78(8): 1140 - 8.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. J. NOONAN, S. L. WEINSTEIN, W. C. JACOBSON, and L. A. DOLAN
Use of the Milwaukee Brace for Progressive Idiopathic Scoliosis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 1996; 78(4): 557 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
D. R. Benson, A. W. Wolf, and H. Shoji
Can the Milwaukee brace patient participate in competitive athletics?
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1977; 5(1): 7 - 12.
[PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
L. Z. Shifrin
Scoliosis--Current Concepts: Early Recognition and Aggressive Treatment are Most Important
Clinical Pediatrics, October 1, 1972; 11(10): 594 - 602.
[Abstract] [PDF]