This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NEER, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by NEER, C. S., II
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1970;52:1090-1103.
© 1970 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures

PART II. TREATMENT OF THREE-PART AND FOUR-PART DISPLACEMENT

CHARLES S. NEER II M.D.1

1 From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, and The New York Orthopaedic Hospital, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York

A study of 117 three-part and four-part displaced proximal humeral fractures, followed for from one to sixteen years, is presented. The ages of the patients averaged 55.3 years. Treatment began with closed reduction in seventy-seven patients, the result of which were accepted in thirty-one. Open reduction was done in forty-three patients, and prosthetic replacement in forty-three patients. Their results were rated by a numerical system. Closed reduction was found inadequate for active, healthy patients in either group. This was because of uncontrollable rotatory displacement in three-part fractures and avascular necrosis of the detached head in four-part fractures. Most of the poor results of open reduction in three-part displacements were due to errors in reduction or fixation while those in four-part displacements were due to avascular necrosis of the head. It. was concluded that the preferable method for three-part fractures was open reduction and that for four-part fractures was prosthetic replacement. Using these indications, the typical result was satisfactory but imperfect and many months were required for maximum recovery. Surgical errors and technique are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
B. L. Badman and M. Mighell
Fixed-angle Locked Plating of Two-, Three-, and Four-part Proximal Humerus Fractures
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., May 1, 2008; 16(5): 294 - 302.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. C. Owsley and J. T. Gorczyca
Displacement/Screw Cutout After Open Reduction and Locked Plate Fixation of Humeral Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2008; 90(2): 233 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
M. S. George
Fractures of the Greater Tuberosity of the Humerus
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., October 1, 2007; 15(10): 607 - 613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. J. Nho, R. H. Brophy, J. U. Barker, C. N. Cornell, and J. D. MacGillivray
Management of Proximal Humeral Fractures Based on Current Literature
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2007; 89(suppl_3): 44 - 58.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. Dimakopoulos, G. Kasimatis, and A. Panagopoulos
Transosseous Suture Fixation of Proximal Humeral Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2007; 89(8): 1700 - 1709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. M. Robinson, A. Akhtar, M. Mitchell, and C. Beavis
Complex Posterior Fracture-Dislocation of the Shoulder. Epidemiology, Injury Patterns, and Results of Operative Treatment
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2007; 89(7): 1454 - 1466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. Levy, M. Frankle, M. Mighell, and D. Pupello
The Use of the Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for the Treatment of Failed Hemiarthroplasty for Proximal Humeral Fracture
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2007; 89(2): 292 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
P. Boileau, R. J. Sinnerton, C. Chuinard, and G. Walch
Arthroplasty of the shoulder
J Bone Joint Surg Br, May 1, 2006; 88-B(5): 562 - 575.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
C. M. Robinson, L. A. K. Khan, and M. A. Akhtar
Treatment of anterior fracture-dislocations of the proximal humerus by open reduction and internal fixation
J Bone Joint Surg Br, April 1, 2006; 88-B(4): 502 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
M. Loew, S. Heitkemper, D. Parsch, S. Schneider, and M. Rickert
Influence of the design of the prosthesis on the outcome after hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder in displaced fractures of the head of the humerus
J Bone Joint Surg Br, March 1, 2006; 88-B(3): 345 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. M. Robinson and J. Aderinto
Posterior Shoulder Dislocations and Fracture-Dislocations
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2005; 87(3): 639 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. Plausinis, Y. W. Kwon, and J. D. Zuckerman
Complications Of Humeral Head Replacement for Proximal Humeral Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2005; 87(1): 204 - 213.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. M. Robinson and R. S. Page
Severely Impacted Valgus Proximal Humeral Fractures: Results of Operative Treatment
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2003; 85(9): 1647 - 1655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. P. Iannotti, M. L. Ramsey, G. R. Williams, and J. J.P. Warner
Nonprosthetic Management of Proximal Humeral Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2003; 85(8): 1578 - 1593.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. M. Robinson, R. S. Page, R. M.F. Hill, D. L. Sanders, C. M. Court-Brown, and A. E. Wakefield
Primary Hemiarthroplasty for Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 3, 2003; 85(7): 1215 - 1223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
D. M.W. Pugh and M. D. McKee
Advances in the Management of Humeral Nonunion
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., January 1, 2003; 11(1): 48 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. J. Wijgman, W. Roolker, T. W. Patt, E. L.F.B. Raaymakers, and R. K. Marti
Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Three and Four-Part Fractures of the Proximal Part of the Humerus
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 12, 2002; 84(11): 1919 - 1925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. J. Rowles and J. E. McGrory
Percutaneous Pinning of the Proximal Part of the Humerus : An Anatomic Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2001; 83(11): 1695 - 1699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
R. J. Naranja Jr and J. P. Iannotti
Displaced Three- and Four-Part Proximal Humerus Fractures: Evaluation and Management
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., November 1, 2000; 8(6): 373 - 382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. K. BEREDJIKLIAN, J. P. IANNOTTI, T. R. NORRIS, and G. R. WILLIAMS
Operative Treatment of Malunion of a Fracture of the Proximal Aspect of the Humerus
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 1998; 80(10): 1484 - 97.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. J. KOVAL, M. A. GALLAGHER, J. G. MARSICANO, F. CUOMO, A. MCSHINAWY, and J. D. ZUCKERMAN
Functional Outcome after Minimally Displaced Fractures of the Proximal Part of the Humerus
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 1997; 79(2): 203 - 7.
[Abstract] [Full Text]