This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WILTSE, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by NELSON, W. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by WILTSE, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by NELSON, W. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1968;50:919-926.
© 1968 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


The Paraspinal Sacrospinalis-Splitting Approach to the Lumbar Spine

LEON L. WILTSE M.D.1, J. GORDON BATEMAN M.D.2, ROBERT H. HUTCHINSON M.D.3, and WILLIAM E. NELSON M.D.4

1 909 Pine Avenue, Long Beach, California 90813
2 911 Pine Avenue, Long Beach, California 90813
3 Long Beach Veterans Administration Hospital, 7th and Bellflower, Long Beach, California 90804
4 3584 Century Boulevard, Lynwood, California 90262

A bilateral approach to the lumbar spine is described in which each sacrospinalis is split on a sagittal plane three-fourths of the way out to the lateral margin of the muscle. The approach is especially valuable for one-level fusions in a young person with spondylolisthesis. One iliac crest usually supplies enough bone for both sides. We have used this approach in forty-nine patients as an alternative to the mid-line line approach and have found that it is extremely valuable in some circumstances.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?