This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LIPPMANN, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LIPPMANN, R. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1967;49:876-890.
© 1967 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


Transfixion Hip Prosthesis

SEQUENTIAL CLINICAL AND ROENTGENOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS OF SIXTY-FOUR PATIENTS FOLLOWED FOR FIVE TO FIFTEEN YEARS

ROBERT K. LIPPMANN M.D.1

1 910 Park Avenue, New York, N. Y. 10021

Sixty-four patients, in whom the transfixion prosthesis had been implanted five to fifteen years previously, were evaluated clinically and roentgenographically. Clinically, the results in fifty-two of the sixty-four patients (81 per cent) at last examination were graded as excellent, good, or acceptable.

Most consistent good results followed implantation for intracapsular fractures and their complications and for idiopathic avascular necrosis. Results in degenerative arthritis were attained more slowly and were quite satsfactory in hips without major deterioration of the acetabular wall and without acetabular deformity that required reaming. These latter conditions were conducive to progressive acetabular intrusion of the prosthetic head and associated pain.

The transfixion prosthesis appears to have a high degree of stability when implanted in sound tissue. Wobble and rotatory or lateral migration were not observed in any patient. Slow progressive settling and acetabular intrusion were encountered. Their incidence, associated symptoms, and presumptive causes are considered. Some of these complications, in retrospect, may be preventable. Some continue to be unpredictable and others, referable to pre-existing tissue defects are now recognized as contraindications to the prosthetic method.

The study suggests that the transfixion prosthesis inserted with precision into healthy osseous tissue provides a degree of stability more secure than that attained by unit instruments.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?