This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WESTIN, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by WESTIN, G. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1967;49:836-875.
© 1967 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


Femoral Lengthening Using a Periosteal Sleeve

REPORT ON TWENTY-SIX CASES

G. WILBUR WESTIN M.D.1

1 2300 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, California 90007

Thirty-three consecutive femoral lengthening procedures on twenty-six patients are reviewed. In all cases the periosteal sleeve technique as described was used. Many of the patients with residua of anterior poliomyelitis had additional stabilizing operative procedures not analyzed in this review. Ten patients had epiphyseodesis either prior to or after lengthening procedures.

Care must be taken in selecting the method of lengthening as well as the type of patient for lengthening. Segmental lengthening by interposition of a graft should be limited to about three centimeters unless a simultaneous shortening of the opposite limb is performed. This type of lengthening procedure is more feasible for very short femora on which the Bost apparatus is difficult to apply. Slow countertraction by the Bost apparatus permits lengthening of five to six cetimeters. Steinmann pins should be at least 3/16 inches in diameter to prevent bending and cutting out through the bone. Careful positioning of the pins is essential. Weakened and distorted abnormal bone may not provide a sufficient purchase for the pins (Figs. 7-A and 7-B).

No complications were attributed to the transverse osteotomy. After surgery, incorporation of the lengthened limb in a hip spica cast may greatly reduce the complications accompanying this method of lengthening. If sciatic-nerve palsy occurs secondary to stretching, lengthening must be halted immediately. Complete return of sciatic function is then usually seen.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. PALEY, J. E. HERZENBERG, G. PAREMAIN, and A. BHAVE
Femoral Lengthening over an Intramedullary Nail. A Matched-Case Comparison with Ilizarov Femoral Lengthening
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 1997; 79(10): 1464 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text]