This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VAN DER HEUL, R. O.
Right arrow Articles by VON RONNEN, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by VAN DER HEUL, R. O.
Right arrow Articles by VON RONNEN, J. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1967;49:415-439.
© 1967 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


Juxtacortical Osteosarcoma

DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT, AND AN ANALYSIS OF EIGHTY CASES

R. O. VAN DER HEUL M.D.1 and J. R. VON RONNEN M.D.1

1 From the Department of Pathology of The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amesterdam, and the Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Leiden

To study the relation of juxtacortical osteosarcoma to intraosseous osteosarcoma and to re-evaluate the treatment of the former, sixty-four cases were collected from the literature and sixteen cases from the archives of the Netherlands Committee on Bone Tumors. A total of eighty cases were studied.

It is concluded that juxtacortical osteosarcoma should be considered a distinctive entity, and a scheme for treatment based on its distinctive features is proposed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. D. Murphey, J. S. Jelinek, H. T. Temple, D. J. Flemming, and F. H. Gannon
Imaging of Periosteal Osteosarcoma: Radiologic-Pathologic Comparison
Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 129 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
V. O. Lewis, M. C. Gebhardt, and D. S. Springfield
Parosteal Osteosarcoma of the Posterior Aspect of the Distal Part of the Femur : Oncological and Functional Results Following a New Resection Technique
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2000; 82(8): 1083 - 1083.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
INT J SURG PATHOLHome page
H. Dominguez-Malagon, J. Y. Ro, and A. G. Ayala
Periosteal Osteosarcoma of the Digits: A Case Report
International Journal of Surgical Pathology, July 1, 1996; 4(1): 55 - 59.
[Abstract] [PDF]