This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MAZET, R.
Right arrow Articles by HOHL, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MAZET, R., JR.
Right arrow Articles by HOHL, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1963;45:82-112.
© 1963 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


Fractures of the Carpal Navicular

ANALYSIS OF NINTY-ONE CASES AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

ROBERT MAZET JR. M.D.1 and MASON HOHL M.D.1

1 From the Orthopaedic Hospital, the Orthopaedic Service of Wadsworth Hospital, Veterans Administration Center, and the University of California Medical Center, Los Angeles

The various forms of treatment for fractures of the carpal navicular have been briefly reviewed, and ninety-one such fractures have been analyzed in detail. Thirty-eight were acute, three were subacute, and fifty were old when first seen.

From this study the following conclusions were reached:

1. Acute fractures of the navicular should be completely immobilized until union has occurred, even though this may require many months.

2. Concomitant injuries, such as dislocation of one or more carpal bones, should be appropriately treated.

3. Gross displacement of fragments should be reduced, by open surgery if necessary.

4. Fractures of the carpal navicular a year old or more have a good chance of uniting if immobilized for many months provided the fragments are not grossly displaced, sclerosis is not present at the fracture line, and there are no arthritic changes visible by roentgenogram.

5. Excision of part or all of the navicular often results in a painful wrist with limited function.

6. Styloidectomy is not recommended for general use. It was effective in relieving pain in only two of eleven cases of old non-union.

7. Styloidectomy combined with a bone graft of the Murray type was the most effective means of securing union of the fracture and relieving wrist pain in the surgically treated cases in this series. The Murray bone graft alone was not nearly so effective.

8. Wrist fusion relieves pain but eliminates wrist motion. It may salvage a comparatively useless wrist.

9. Active treatment of every non-union is not necessary. Persons who do not do manual work are often able to live useful happy lives with some limitation of wrist motion and occasional discomfort, despite an old ununited fracture.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
R. A. Shively and M. Sundaram
Ununited fractures of the scaphoid in boxers: A therapeutic dilemma
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1980; 8(6): 440 - 442.
[PDF]