This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amstutz, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Amstutz, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, P. D., JR.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1962;44:1-24.
© 1962 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


Dysgenesis of the Proximal Femur (Coxa Vara) and Its Surgical Management

Harlan C. Amstutz M.D.1 and Philip D. Wilson JR. M.D.1

1 NEW YORK, N. Y.

In dysgenesis of the proximal part of the femur there are three distinct groups: congenital short femur with coxa vara, congenital bowed femur with coxa vara, and congenital coxa vara.

Congenital shortening of the femur and congenital bowing of the femur are unique deformities and their classification as congenital aberrations seems obvious. The deformity of congenital coxa vara, however, is less distinctive and its differential diagnosis is therefore more difficult.

In congenital shortening of the femur with coxa vara there is severe shortening, and the most essential step in treatment is the fitting of a suitable prosthesis; surgical intervention, therefore, should be restricted to procedures which facilitate the use of a prosthetic device. Syme amputation has proved to be the most useful in this respect.

In congenital bowed femur with coxa vara, the shortening is less severe, but still marked. Either a prosthetic device or elevated shoe will be necessary. The coxa vara does not usually progress to a marked degree, and the indications for subtrochanteric osteotomy are as yet poorly defined. Because of the concomitant dysplasia of the hip, osteotomy may be contra-indicated.

In the treatment of congenital coxa vara there are three aims: (1) correction of deformity, (2) promotion of ossification of the cartilaginous neck, and (3) prevention of recurrence. In the majority of these children, the varus is rapidly progressive, and there is a wide and vertically oriented linear defect in the neck for which early radical osteotomy with bone transfixation of the femoral neck is indicated. In the minority of patients who have mild deformity or in whom the varus does not progress significantly, the indications for osteotomy are essentially functional and the procedure may be safely delayed for several years. In this mild form, correction does not have to be as radical as in the cases with severe and progressive varus.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
J. A. Bailey II and P. Beighton
Bilateral Femoral Dysgenesis
Clinical Pediatrics, November 1, 1970; 9(11): 668 - 674.
[Abstract] [PDF]