This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Donoghue, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kenyon, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by O'Donoghue, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kenyon, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1961;43:1167-1178.
© 1961 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


Repair of Knee Ligaments in Dogs

I. The Lateral Collateral Ligament

Don H. O'Donoghue M.D.1, Charles A. Rockwood Jr. 1, Basilius Zaricznyj M.D.2, and Rex Kenyon M.D.2

1 Medical Corps, United States Air Force
2 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

The experiment was undertaken in response to the three questions previously posed. We believe that these questions have been satisfactorily if not completely answered:

1. When the ends of a ruptured ligament are in approximation, healing occurs by an orderly process: first, by necrosis and cellular infiltration, then by fibroblastic invasion, and finally, by collagenization. If the ligament ends are not in close approximation, this orderly process does not occur and healing is by diffuse extensive scar formation. As time passes, the scar at the site of rupture becomes more orderly and its structure begins to resemble that of a normal ligament. Up to ten weeks, however, this scar had not become normal ligament even under the most favorable circumstances. Possibly, normal ligament would have developed if the process had been followed longer.

2. The most favorable circumstance for repair is end-to-end direct apposition of ligament fibers. This minimizes scarring, accelerates repair, hastens collagenization, and produces the most normal-appearing healed ligament.

3. Tests of the tensile strength of the divided lateral collateral ligament in our dogs suggest that after six or more weeks of immobilization, the strength of the attachment of the ligament to bone is diminished, presumably as the result of the atrophy of disuse. It would appear that during the first few weeks after such immobilization, care should be taken to prevent damage to this weakened area. This will need further confirmatory work.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
G. L. Derscheid and J. G. Garrick
Medial collateral ligament injuries in football: Nonoperative management of grade I and grade II sprains
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1981; 9(6): 365 - 368.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
H. E. Cabaud, A. Chatty, V. Gildengorin, and R. J. Feltman
Exercise effects on the strength of the rat anterior cruciate ligament
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1980; 8(2): 79 - 86.
[Abstract] [PDF]