This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tonna, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cronkite, E. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tonna, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cronkite, E. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1961;43:352-362.
© 1961 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


Cellular Response to Fracture Studied with Tritiated Thymidine

Edgar A. Tonna Ph.D.1 and Eugene P. Cronkite M.D.1

1 Medical Research Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton

An autoradiographic study of femoral-fracture repair using tritiated thymidine was made on forty-two female mice, five weeks of age.

Assessment of the periosteal labeling index was obtained from one hour to fourteen days after fracture.

Results showed that the initial proliferative response is seen in the periosteum and adjacent soft tissues sixteen hours after fracture. No increase in proliferation was observed at eight hours. The reaction was not limited to the fracture site but extended along the entire femoral diaphysis. The maximum increase of the labeled periosteal population (25.4 per cent) was observed at thirty-two hours after fracture.

After thirty-two hours, the size of the labeled population decreased with increasing time. The decrease was more apparent away from the fracture site, so that within five days of fracture the proliferative potential was similar to that of the non-fractured control femur. Fourteen days after fracture, the labeled population of periosteal cells at the fracture site was still above the value of the controls. The course of fracture repair was followed autoradiographically.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?