This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schajowicz, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schajowicz, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1961;43:1-29.
© 1961 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


Giant-Cell Tumors of Bone (Osteoclastoma)

A Pathological and Histochemical Study

Fritz Schajowicz M.D.1

1 Center of Osteoarticular Pathology and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Italian Hospital, Buenos Aires

1. A series of eighty-five cases of giant-cell tumors of bone studied in the course of the last twenty years is reviewed. Comparative clinical, roentgenographic, pathological, and systematic histochemical studies have been carried out.

2. The clinical and pathological findings confirm the necessity of treating these tumors as an entity, because they are neoplastic processes capable of progressive growth, recur in a large percentage of cases, and, in 7 to 15 per cent of cases become transformed into sarcomata. They may produce metastases without visible malignant transformation. The so-called variants, which in general have a favorable prognosis, are easily distinguishable from true giant-cell tumors.

3. With the exception of a few rare cases showing a frankly malignant microscopic structure, there was no evident correlation between the histological appearance and the clinical and roentgenographic features. For this reason, grading of this neoplasm is now considered of little value. It is sufficient to establish a diagnosis of true giant-cell tumor to justify complete resection of the lesion. This diagnosis can be made by aspiration biopsy.

4. I believe that the giant cell derives from the mononuclear cell of the stroma and is thus of mesenchymal origin. I think that it is formed not only by agglutination and conglomeration of these cells, as is maintained by the majority of writers, but also by repeated division of the stromal-cell nuclei, without corresponding cytoplasmic division. This is probably accomplished by amitosis or nuclear segmentation, which has been observed in tissue cultures.

5. Systematic histochemical investigations of normal tissues, true giantcell tumors, and many bone lesions and extra-osseous lesions, which are characterized by the richness of multinucleated giant cells, were done. The giant cells in these tissues have a very similar histochemical behavior. A close physiological and histogenetic relationship is thus established between normal osteoclastic and chondroclastic giant cells and those of giant-cell tumor.

6. Giant cells are characterized by an abundance of acid phosphatase, betaglucuronidase, and succinic dehydrogenase; the absence of alkaline phosphatase; and the presence in their cytoplasm of non-glycogen carbohydrates, principally acid mucopolysaccharides, and complex lipids. The stromal cells of giant-cell tumors do not generally show enzymatic reactions, nor do they possess glycogen, mucopolysaccharides, or glycolipids in significant amounts.

7. Histochemical study is of no diagnostic value when differentiating the giant-cell tumor from its so-called variants.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
B. Hoch, C. Inwards, M. Sundaram, and A. E. Rosenberg
Multicentric Giant Cell Tumor of Bone. Clinicopathologic Analysis of Thirty Cases
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2006; 88(9): 1998 - 2008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. D. Murphey, G. C. Nomikos, D. J. Flemming, F. H. Gannon, H. T. Temple, and M. J. Kransdorf
Imaging of Giant Cell Tumor and Giant Cell Reparative Granuloma of Bone: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2001; 21(5): 1283 - 1309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
Y.-K. PARK, K. N. RYU, C.-S. HAN, and D. K. BAE
Multifocal, Metachronous Giant-Cell Tumor of the Ulna. A Case Report
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 1999; 81(3): 409 - 13.
[Full Text]