This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evans, E. B.
Right arrow Articles by Blumel, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Evans, E. B.
Right arrow Articles by Blumel, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1960;42:737-758.
© 1960 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


Experimental Immobilization and Remobilization of Rat Knee Joints

E. Burke Evans M.D.1, G. W.N. Eggers M.D.1, James K. Butler M.A.1, and Johanna Blumel Ph.D.1

1 Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Division, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston

This is a histological study of rat knee joints that were subjected to limitation of motion alone or were remobilized after varying periods of restricted movement. A progression of morphological changes consequent to restriction of motion was found, and it was possible to gain some indication of the degree of reversibility of these changes after varying periods of immobilization and remobilization either by a single forced manipulation, or by active movement alone, or by repeated gentle passive movement. On the basis of this study, we have arrived at the following conclusions in regard to experimental joint immobilization and remobilization in the rat:

1. Rigid immobilization is not essential to produce structural change, and the maintenance of a slight range of motion will not prevent structural changes;

2. After prolonged immobilization, contracture of both the muscles and the capsule is responsible for restriction of motion, with shortening of the muscles being primarily at fault;

3. Proliferation of intracapsular connective tissue and the formation of adhesions are primary responses to limitation of motion—to a limited degree these changes are reversible;

4. Major cartilage alterations, such as matrix fibrillation, cleft formation and ulceration, as well as their adjacent subchondral lesions, result from abnormal friction and pressure in a joint compromised by limitation of motion—these changes are not reversible;

5. In the rat, the joint changes that are caused by restriction of motion appear to be reversible if the period of immobilization does not exceed thirty days—after sixty days of immobilization all major joint alterations consequent to the restriction of motion have appeared, and further immobilization after this time only causes changes in the degree of these alterations;

6. With forced remobilization there is tearing of the connective tissue that has proliferated within the joint, often in a plane different from that of the original joint cleft; subsequently, associated with continued motion of the joint, a cellular layer with the characteristics of synovial membrane forms about the surfaces of the new cleft;

7. Three methods of remobilization—forced, active, and passive—were used in these experiments, which were equally effective in restoring of the range of motion; after thirty-five days of remobilization by any means the joints were histologically indistinguishable.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
T. N. LINDENFELD, E. M. WOJTYS, and A. HUSAIN
Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons - Operative Treatment of Arthrofibrosis of the Knee*{{dagger}}
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 1999; 81(12): 1772 - 84.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. Djurasovic, J. W. Aldridge, R. Grumbles, M. P. Rosenwasser, D. Howell, and A. Ratcliffe
Knee Joint Immobilization Decreases Aggrecan Gene Expression in the Meniscus
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 1998; 26(3): 460 - 466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
M. O Jortikka, R. I Inkinen, M. I Tammi, J. J Parkkinen, J. Haapala, I. Kiviranta, H. J Helminen, and M. J Lammi
Immobilisation causes longlasting matrix changes both in the immobilised and contralateral joint cartilage
Ann Rheum Dis, April 1, 1997; 56(4): 255 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
L. E. Paulos, D. C. Wnorowski, and A. E. Greenwald
Infrapatellar Contracture Syndrome: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Long-Term Followup
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1994; 22(4): 440 - 449.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
T. R. Carter, P. J. Fowler, and C. Blokker
Functional postoperative treatment of Achilles tendon repair
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1992; 20(4): 459 - 462.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
C. T. Lechner and L. E. Dahners
Healing of the medial collateral ligament in unstable rat knees
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 1991; 19(5): 508 - 512.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
F. R. Noyes, R. E. Mangine, and S. Barber
Early knee motion after open and arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1987; 15(2): 149 - 160.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
H. E. Cabaud, A. Chatty, V. Gildengorin, and R. J. Feltman
Exercise effects on the strength of the rat anterior cruciate ligament
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1980; 8(2): 79 - 86.
[Abstract] [PDF]