This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cleveland, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ishizuka, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cleveland, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ishizuka, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1959;41:1399-1408.
© 1959 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


A Ten-Year Analysis of Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Femur

Mather Cleveland M.D.1, David M. Bosworth M.D.1, Frederick R. Thompson M.D.1, Hudson J. Wilson JR. M.D.1, and Tadao Ishizuka M.D.1

1 Orthopaedic Service, St. Luke's Hospital, New York

1. Treatment of trochanteric fractures of the femur has become that of surgical fixation. The presence of associated geriatric pathology and complications demand team work from the medical, urological, surgical, and orthopaedic staffs.

2. There is a 16.4 per cent chance that a patient with a trochanteric fracture will, at some time, sustain another separate hip fracture. This indicates a need for permanent protection.

3. The original placement of a one-piece Jewett nail, to a large part, determines the outcome. Multiple drives to obtain good position are acceptable and do not adversely influence the end result.

4. Where fixation demands a fully driven nail, the possibility of its later penetration should be accepted.

5. Failure of metallic fixation devices is bound to occur, in regard to both stability in osseous structure and fatigue fracture of time implant. Even if reasonable design of the appliance is present, and its internal structure has been tested by accepted methods, a small percentage of such fatigue fractures should be considered as inevitable.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?