This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KELLY, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by LIPSCOMB, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KELLY, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by LIPSCOMB, P. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1958;40:675-680.
© 1958 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


Primary Vitallium-Mold Arthroplasty for Posterior Dislocation of the Hip with Fracture of the Femoral Head

PATRICK J. KELLY M.D.1 and PAUL R. LIPSCOMB M.D.1

1 Section of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester

Fracture of the femoral head associated with posterior dislocation is rare. Although our experience is small, we present these cases because in them treatment carried out soon after the injury was more active than in most cases recorded in the literature.

In eight patients with capital fragments involving a third to a half of the femoral head, primary Vitallium-mold arthroplasty has yielded seven satisfactory results. Only four of these patients have been followed for prolonged periods, but, of the remaining, three appear to be repeating the progress of our earlier patients.

Our plan of treatment for these injuries is as follows:

1. Primary Vitallium-mold arthroplasty is indicated if fracture of the femoral head involves a third to a half of the head. If reduction has been impossible and injury to the weight-bearing surface is present, then excision of the detached fragment and primary arthroplasty seem the treatment of choice.

2. In the unusual case, when anatomical reduction is possible by closed manipulation, a good result may sometimes be expected. If practical, it might be well to confirm reduction by stereoscopic roentgenograms or posterior oblique views as described by Waller.

3. When prompt closed reduction is possible, or when the fragment of the femoral head is small and does not involve the weight-bearing portion of the hip, a good result may be achieved by removal of the fragment without redislocating the hip.

Finally, we favor Vitallium-mold arthroplasty to a prosthesis. If later reconstructive surgery should be necessary, as it was in Case 8, it can be more easily accomplished.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. C. Mears and J. H. Velyvis
Acute Total Hip Arthroplasty for Selected Displaced Acetabular Fractures : Two to Twelve-Year Results
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2002; 84(1): 1 - 9.
[Abstract] [Full Text]