This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KNIGHT, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by MAYNE, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KNIGHT, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by MAYNE, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1957;39:1343-1355.
© 1957 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


Comminuted Fractures and Fracture-Dislocations Involving the Articular Surface of the Humeral Head

ROBERT A. KNIGHT M.D.1 and JUAN A. MAYNE M.D.1

1 Campbell Foundation and the University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Memphis

1 . Fractures and fracture-dislocations of the articular surface of the humeral head are severely disabling.

2. Pain is seldom a significant factor in the result (Table III). Rather, weakness, limitation of motion, and reduced endurance are the usual complaints.

3. The patient is more often satisfied with the result than is the orthopaedic surgeon who has treated him (Table V).

4. The result must be evaluated by a realistic set of criteria. Even so, the results of treatment in this study were acceptable to the examiners in only 50 per cent of the cases, and to the patients in 60 per cent of the cases.

5. Results might be improved by following the recommendations made regarding surgical technique.

6. The insertion of a prosthesis, although not yet conclusively demonstrated to be effective in solving the problems raised by this injury, is most logically considered for use in that group of comminuted fractures and fracture-dislocations which, in this series, have been treated by resection or by resection and cuff transplantation. Should the long-term results be superior, the use of a prosthesis may conceivably be advisable in the treatment of the more severely comminuted fractures of the humeral head which are now being treated by open reduction.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. M. Robinson, A. Akhtar, M. Mitchell, and C. Beavis
Complex Posterior Fracture-Dislocation of the Shoulder. Epidemiology, Injury Patterns, and Results of Operative Treatment
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2007; 89(7): 1454 - 1466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]