This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mazet, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bechtol, C. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mazet, R., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Bechtol, C. O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1956;38:1185-1198.
© 1956 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


Upper-Extremity Amputation Surgery and Prosthetic Prescription

Robert Mazet Jr. M.D.1, Craig L. Taylor Ph.D.1, and Charles O. Bechtol M.D.1

1 Prosthetic Laboratory, Department of Engineering, University of California at Los Angeles; the Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles; and the Wadsworth General Hospital, Veterans Administration Center, Los Angeles

Inasmuch as a number of persons with amputations in the so-called undesirable areas have been successfully fitted with appliances developed in recent years, it is our contention that the concept of "sites of election" in upper-extremity amputations is obsolete. Amputation surgery of the upper extremity should be directed toward saving all possible length in all areas. Prosthetic considerations need not dictate the amputation site. Physical aspects, such as skin coverage, adequacy of circulation, good innervation, and function of the part to be saved, should be the determining factors in the decision as to the level of amputation.

Familiarity with the latest techniques of prosthetic manufacture and fitting are as essential for the surgeon as his knowledge of surgical techniques. Realization of the potentialities and limitations of recently developed prosthetic appurtenances are necessary for the prescription of the appliance best suited to the needs of the individual. Functional prosthetic replacements are available for almost all types of upper-extremity amputations10 {Fig. 15}. Prescription of the prosthesis which is best suited to the individual requirements of the patient is the privilege of the surgeon. This cannot be delegated.

The surgeon should share the responsibility for amputee rehabilitation with the other members of the prosthetic team (the patient, therapist, trainer, prosthetist, job counselor, and psychologist), but he must remain captain. His responsibility to the patient does not terminate with wound healing. It continues through the period of rehabilitation. He must, with cooperation from other team members, supervise the readjustment of the patient to his handicap and direct the restoration of the patient to social and economic independence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?