This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laing, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laing, P. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1956;38:1105-1116.
© 1956 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


The Arterial Supply of the Adult Humerus

P. G. Laing M.D., F.R.C.S. (Eng.)1

1 Surgical and Pathological Services, Lancaster Department of Veterans Affairs Hospital, Lancaster

It is worth repeating that in all of these bones the periosteum with its rich blood supply had been removed. A true picture of the blood supply can only be obtained by keeping this abundant source of arterial blood in mind. The constancy of the main nutrient artery of the humeral shaft is remarkable. It would appear to be prudent to guard against injuring this vessel in operations on the humeral shaft. The danger of damaging this artery will probably be greatest in open reductions of fractures of the mid-shaft of the bone. Fractures through the shaft at the junction of the middle and lower thirds will probably destroy the main nutrient at the time of injury. The upper end of the lower fragment will then depend for arterial blood supply on vessels entering from the periosteum and those ascending from the epicondyles. Extensive stripping of the periosteum of the lower fragment in open reductions in this region would probably be best avoided. The upper half of the shaft has an excellent blood supply from the ascending branch of the main nutrient artery and from the accessory nutrient arteries. This may account for the predilection of secondary malignant deposits for this part of the bone.

The main blood supply of the humeral head enters it anterolaterally above the common site of fractures of the surgical neck. Both bone ends thus have a good blood supply. This may account for the rapidity of union of these fractures. However, in operating on this region, whether for repair of rotator-cuff injuries or for open reduction of fracture-dislocations of the surgical neck, it is perhaps worth while bearing in mind that the main blood supply of the head enters it via the upper end of the bicipital groove or via the adjacent parts of the greater and lesser tuberosities. If damage to these vessels is avoided the viability of the humeral head may be preserved.

The importance of preserving muscular and ligamentous attachments when operating on the lower end of the humerus is well known. The size of the posterior arteries entering the epicondyles and condyles is, however, worth bearing in mind. If damage to these posterior vessels is avoided in operations on fractures in this region, the viability of the bone fragments may well be preserved and subsequent degenerative changes in the elbow joint may be avoided.

The intramedullary course of the nutrient arteries (Fig. 16) must mean that they will be destroyed by the insertion of intramedullary nails. If at the same time an open reduction of the fractured shaft is performed, periosteal stripping of the bone ends will be inevitable. The blood supply of the shaft would then be unduly jeopardized. Both the branches of the main and accessory nutrient arteries in the medulla and the only possible local collateral circulation, the periosteal vessels, would be destroyed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. M. Robinson and J. Aderinto
Posterior Shoulder Dislocations and Fracture-Dislocations
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2005; 87(3): 639 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. L. Andary and S. A. Petersen
The Vascular Anatomy of the Glenohumeral Capsule and Ligaments: An Anatomic Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 9, 2002; 84(12): 2258 - 2265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. J. Wijgman, W. Roolker, T. W. Patt, E. L.F.B. Raaymakers, and R. K. Marti
Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Three and Four-Part Fractures of the Proximal Part of the Humerus
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 12, 2002; 84(11): 1919 - 1925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. P. Banco, D. Andrisani, M. Ramsey, B. Frieman, and J. M. Fenlin Jr.
The Parachute Technique: Valgus Impaction Osteotomy for Two-Part Fractures of the Surgical Neck of the Humerus
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2001; 83(90021): S38 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
R. J. Naranja Jr and J. P. Iannotti
Displaced Three- and Four-Part Proximal Humerus Fractures: Evaluation and Management
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., November 1, 2000; 8(6): 373 - 382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
A. S. Reddy and R. W. Frederick
Evaluation of the Intraosseous and Extraosseous Blood Supply to the Distal Femoral Condyles
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 1998; 26(3): 415 - 419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. YAMAGUCHI, F. A. SWEET, R. BINDRA, B. F. MORREY, and R. H. GELBERMAN
The Extraosseous and Intraosseous Arterial Anatomy of the Adult Elbow*{{dagger}}
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 1997; 79(11): 1653 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. GERBER, S. M. LAMBERT, and H. M. HOOGEWOUD
Absence of Avascular Necrosis of the Humeral Head after Post-Traumatic Rupture of the Anterior and Posterior Humeral Circumflex Arteries. A Case Report
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 1996; 78(8): 1256 - 9.
[Full Text]