This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mora, F. B.
Right arrow Articles by Llamedo, L. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mora, F. B.
Right arrow Articles by Llamedo, L. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1955;37:156-168.
© 1955 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES ON THE TREATMENT OF BONE AND JOINT TUBERCULOSIS WITH DIHYDROSTREPTOMYCIN AND ISONICOTINIC ACID HYDRAZIDE

Felipe Bastos Mora 1 and Luís Portal Llamedo 1

1 Clinic of Professor Bastos Ansart, Barcelona

The results observed in different specimens allow us to draw some preliminary conclusions concerning the influence of treatment with dihydrostreptomycin and isonicotinic acid hydrazide on the anatomical chansges of tuberculous lesions. These conclusions may be summarized as follows:

Dihydrostreptomycin and isonicotinic acid hydrazide admimsistered ins large qunanities do not appear to bring about a complete reversal of specific changes. This was found to be true even when treatment was begun simultanseously with the inoculation.

In almost all of the cases treatment proved highly beneficial in respect to progression of the experimental lesions. In all treated animals the lesions were smaller than in the constrols and were more sharply demarcated. The drugs appeared to have the greatest influence on the development of the lymphatic lesions. In no instance was there histological evidence of cure or of the development of a productive or cicatricial reactions as the result of treatment.

A comparative study of specimens obtained before and after treatment showed that the main action of the drug is to inhibit the spontaneous progressive course of the process. There is little influence on its regressions.

A comparison between animals treated with dihydrostreptomycin and isonicotinic acid hydrazide in equivalent doses shows almost no difference between the effects obtained with the two drugs.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?