This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ray, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Mosiman, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ray, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Mosiman, R. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1955;37:143-155.
© 1955 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


STUDIES OF BONE METABOLISM

I. A Comparison of the Metabolism of Strontium90 in Living and Dead Bone

Robert D. Ray M.D., Ph.D.1, Duane La Violette B.S.1, Harold D. Buckley M.D.1, and Roscoe S. Mosiman M.D.1

1 Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle

From the foregoing experiments, it is concluded that viability of the bone cells is not essential in the process of inorganic salt uptake by bone, provided the organic matrix is present and normal. The term "uptake", as used in this report, includes several possible processes: ionic exchange, recrystallization, and the formation of new crystals either in the old matrix or in conjunction with the formation of a new matrix. The latter can be demonstrated histologically in living tissue cultures of bone (Fig. 3). However, the amount of matrix formed over a ten-day period is probably insignificant in the over-all process of salt metabolism in tissue cultures, and, of course, need not be considered in the case of the dead bone (Fig. 4). Mobilization of the inorganic salts from bone, on the other hand, is facilitated by the presence of living cells. A corollary of these conclusions is that uptake of radio-active isotopes is probably not an accurate index of bone-cell "viability". This confirms the conclusion previously suggested by the work of Odell and his associates. A second conclusion reached from the present experiment is that the change in radiographic density in aseptic necrosis of bone is probably the result of combined failure of mobilization of inorganic salts and continued uptake by the necrotic bone from the tissue fluids, in addition to the decrease in density of the surrounding viable bone,—that is, the increase in density of the dead bone is actual as well as relative. An interesting sidelight on these observations is that bone-seeking radio-active emitters, such as radium, probably become relatiely fixed in the skeleton when radiation damage is sufficient to cause necrosis of the cells.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?