This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carroll, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Taber, T. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carroll, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Taber, T. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1954;36:912-920.
© 1954 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


DIGITAL ARTHROPLASTY OF THE PROXIMAL INTERPHALANGEAL JOINT

Robert E. Carroll M.D.1 and Thomas H. Taber M.D.1

1 Hand Service, New York Orthopaedic Hospital, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, and the United States Naval Hospital, St. Albans

There is a definite value in a surgical arthroplasty for the ankylosed proximal interphalangeal joint. The existing literature does not give an adequate evaluation of the procedure and its results, and the reported series have been small. As an aid in the problem of the stiff and deformed finger, the knowledge gained from thirty cases has been outlined. The longest period of follow-up has been seven years. The disabling factors have been fracture, dislocation, and infection at the proximal interphalangeal joint.

Arthroplasty has been found valuable as a method of reconstruction for deformities of the proximal interphalangeal joint in selected cases. No attempt has been made to replace the use and technique of joint arthrodesis in the flexed position of function. Criteria in the selection of cases must include: (1) ankylosis in a position of great deformity; (2) no damage to the tendons which produce motion at the middle joint; and (3) a high degree of motivation in the patient to regain mobility. The most simple technique, consisting in resection of the distal portion of the proximal phalanx, has beeen used. It is not believed necessary to use interposed tissue, metals, or plastic material for the formation of the new joint. Skeletal traction has been maintained for six weeks. An active, closely supervised program of rehabilitation has been found necessary. In the authors' first thirty patients, there has been improvement in 83 per cent. They hope to report better results in the future.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
M. Rizzo and R. D Beckenbaugh
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., March 1, 2007; 15(3): 189 - 197.
[Full Text] [PDF]