This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, F. C.
Right arrow Articles by Key, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, F. C.
Right arrow Articles by Key, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1954;36:577-616.
© 1954 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


FRACTURE HEALING AFTER FIXATION WITH STANDARD PLATES CONTACT SPLINTS, AND MEDULLARY NAILS

An Experimental Study

Fred C. Reynolds M.D.1 and J. Albert Key M.D.1

1 Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, and The David P. Wohl, Jr., Memorial Hospital, St. Louis

When infection occurred, the fractures failed to unite and, within the time limits of this experiment, the picture presented was essentially the same regardless of the type of fixation used. In clean wounds in Group I, progress of union was about the same with both types of plates, with a slight advantage in favor of the Eggers plate. Although accurate measurements were not used, we did not see evidence of the fragments sliding on the plates after the callus had formed. With clean wounds in the second part of the experiment, progress of the union was ahead on the side treated with the Eggers plate except in those animals in which the nail fitted snugly and in these it was in favor of the nail. We do not feel that the medullary nail delays union, but rather that lack of fixation due to a poorly fitting nail may delay union. Within the scope of this experiment it appears that fixation and apposition of the fractured fragments are more important in obtaininig union than the pressure of weight-bearing.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?