This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hurteau, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by Sinclair, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hurteau, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by Sinclair, E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1954;36:393-400.
© 1954 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc

ARACHNOIDITIS FOLLOWING THE USE OF IODIZED OIL

Everett F. Hurteau M.D.1, William C. Baird M.D.1, and Ernest Sinclair M.D.1

1 Akron, Ohio

1. Clinical and laboratory data presented suggest that pantopaque and other iodized oils may contribute to, or possibly cause, severe reaction within the subarachnoid space.

2. Verbal communication indicating similar experience among orthopaedists and neurosurgeons has suggested to us that there is need for a more critical evaluation of the properties of pantopaque and other iodized oils and a more conservative approach to their use than is often practised. The importance of complete removal of the substance is evident.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?