This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frankel, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frankel, C. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1954;36:69-74.
© 1954 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


ASPIRATION BIOPSY OF THE SPINE

Charles J. Frankel M.D.1

1 Orthopaedic Department, University of Virginia Hospital, Charlottesville

Aspiration biopsy of the spine is a valuable although not an infallible method of obtaining a diagnosis in obscure lesions of the spine. It must be remembered that, since small bits of tissue are obtained through a partially blind approach, a negative diagnosis in many cases simply indicates a failure to aspirate pathological tissue and does not necessarily imply an absence of pathology. The pathology laboratory should not be criticized for simply reporting what is seen on the slides.

It is suggested that the procedure be used more widely—together with laboratory, clinical, and roentgenographic aids in obscure cases. More than ordinary caution should be exercised to observe the rules of surgical technique, judgment, and interpretation. The anatomy of the spine should be kept in mind and the technique which has been developed through trial and error should be followed carefully. We believe that, if the patient has been anaesthetized, he will be subject to less hazard from possible injury to vital parts. If possible, the unhappy experience of losing tissue after it has been extracted must be avoided by careful labeling and cooperation with the pathology department and the laboratories.

A small but interesting series of cases have been observed. In many of these cases, diagnosis, at least in our hands, would not have been possible had we not been able to examine the tissue directly obtained from the pathologically involved area.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?