This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carr, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Turnipseed, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carr, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Turnipseed, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1953;35:153-171.
© 1953 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


EXPERIENCES WITH INTRAMEDULLARY FIXATION OF COMPOUND FEMORAL FRACTURES IN WAR WOUNDS

Chalmers R. Carr 1 and Derrick Turnipseed 1

1 United States Naval Hospital, Oakland, California

The authors have presented a group of compound fractures of the femur due to gunshot wounds, which they have stabilized by intramedullary fixation. These were a small portion of the scores of such injuries which came under our care or observation during the first six months of the Korean conflict. To our knowledge many more operations of this type have been performed, but at this time it is not possible to correlate the combined experience of those engaged in using this technique.

In our series we have had no catastrophes, no major loss of limb, and no deaths which could be attributed to the technique. In fact, none of the patients in whom we have used pin has as yet succumbed from any cause.

It is the authors' opinion that, if such a technique is to be used, all the basic principles modern war surgery must be carefully adhered to. Sufficient initial débridement, good after-care, and the proper selection of the time interval for internal fixation will determine outcome.

Intramedullary stabilization by itself cannot overcome infection in bone. However, immobilization of the fracture permits the return of bodily vigor and mental health and prevents complete disuse and atrophy of the limb. As a result, it enhances the healing of bone in the presence of infection.

The authors are of the opinion that, if these wounds have not healed prior to surgery, they should be left open and treated as open infected wounds. The presence of the metallic nail does not retard this healing but hastens it ; the nail, therefore, should not be removed during the healing process unless it is clearly evident that it is poorly placed mechanically and is contributing to the persistence of the infection. This has not occurred in any cases observed by us.

With proper selection of cases, adequate armamentarium, and properly trained surgeons, this technique is feasible, and when compared with alternatives is safe.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?