This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BRODERICK, T. F.
Right arrow Articles by BARR, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BRODERICK, T. F., JR.
Right arrow Articles by BARR, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1952;34:909-914.
© 1952 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


TENDON TRANSPLANTATIONS IN THE LOWER EXTREMITY

A Review of End Results in Poliomyelitis II. Tendon Transplantations at the Knee

THOMAS F. BRODERICK JR. M.D.1, JOHN A. REIDY M.D.1, and JOSEPH S. BARR M.D.1

1 BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS

Early tendon transplantations were confined to the foot following Nicoladoni's original operation in 1881. The knee offered the next logical site for experimentation and Goldthwait in 1897 reported on successful sartorius transplants to strengthen weak quadriceps muscles. Subsequently all the thigh muscles, individually or in combination, have been so employed.

In this end-result study we have evaluated thirty-eight patients in whom thirty-nine transplantations at the knee were done between 1922 and 1946 with an average followup of nine and two-tenths years. The subjective results were similar to those in other reports and were in general good, but on objective grounds the results were disappointing.

Knee-extension power following tendon transplantation was rated fair or better in only 30 per cent. of the cases. Seven of twelve patients using braces preoperatively were enabled to discard their braces. Even in these apparently successful cases the effect of the tendon transplantation and of other operative procedures could not be evaluated separately.

Comparison of the transplantation cases with control groups with similar patterns of muscle weakness leads us to draw certain important conclusions. The function of the extremity, as well as the ability to walk without apparatus, is dependent on a number of factors. There has been a tendency to assume that the most important factor is quadriceps or extensor power. Our study suggests that other factors are of equal importance. Good hip, posterior thigh, and calf musculature will permit excellent function, even when the quadriceps is paralyzed. On the contrary, the extremity with good quadriceps power and poor posterior musculature usually requires bracing. Good power in extension of the knee is less important in brace-free walking than is a stable foot and good posterior musculature. Tendon transplantation at the knee in some instances impairs function by the production of hyperextension deformities, dislocation of the patella, or lateral instability. Although a number of cases in this series have apparently been greatly benefited by muscle transplants, others must be rated as failure.

The indications for tendon transplantation to improve extensor power of the knee are not easy to formulate. It is our belief that in the past such operations have been done too frequently.

Poliomyelitis has been described as a subtractive disease, and ill-advised tendon transplantation at the knee in some instances is a subtractive operation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?