This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CASAGRANDE, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by INDECK, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CASAGRANDE, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by INDECK, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1951;33:723-730.
© 1951 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


DENERVATION OF THE ANKLE JOINT

PETER A. CASAGRANDE M.D.1, BERT P. AUSTIN M.D.1, and WALTER INDECK M.D.1

1 University of Buffalo School of Medicine and the Orthopaedic Department of the Buffalo General Hospital

It is believed that effective denervation of the ankle joint can be accomplished by transection of the articular branches from the posterior tibial and deep peroneal nerves together with sectioning of the lateral terminal division of the deep peroneal nerve. The motor loss from such a procedure, involving only the extensor digitorum brevis, is negligible.

From the evidence at hand it would seem that development of a neuropathic joint is theoretically impossible. In practice, this has been borne out in denervation operations on other joints, including neurectomies for the entire lower leg and foot, which incidentally would render the ankle joint anaesthetic. There have been no reports in the literature of development of neuropathic joints following such operations.

The operation is not presented as a panacea. It will not replace arthrodesis as the method of treatment in the severe arthritides or in patients with instability of the ankle joint. The early success in the cases reported here is worthy of consideration. A relatively simple operation, effective in alleviating symptoms, may be substituted for fusion in selected cases.

The value of the procedure can be determined only by a more extensive series, which will also develop criteria for its use.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?