This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by EVANS, F. G.
Right arrow Articles by LISSNER, H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by EVANS, F. G.
Right arrow Articles by LISSNER, H. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1951;33:485-501.
© 1951 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


THE ROLE OF TENSILE STRESS IN THE MECHANISM OF FEMORAL FRACTURES

F. GAYNOR EVANS PH.D.1, HERBERT E. PEDERSEN M.D.1, and H. R. LISSNER M.S.1

1 Departments of Anatomy and Engineering Mechanics, Wayne University, Detroit

1. Static and dynamic loading tests were made on fifty femora from dissecting-room, adult cadavera of known sex, age, and race. The cause of death was also known, and no grossly pathological bones were used. All bones were not loaded to failure.

2. Most of the bones were "stresscoated" so that the tensile deformation pattern produced during the tests was obtained.

3. In each test the magnitude, point of application, direction, and type of force, as well as the orientation of the bone, were the controlled variables. These factors, however, were not uniform in all tests.

4. Vertical transverse fractures of the femoral neck were produced by static vertical loading of the fensoral head. No torsional force was involved.

5. Static vertical loading of the femur clearly demonstrated its behavior as an elastic body.

6. Subcapital, intertrochanteric, abduction, horizontal, and oblique fractures of the neck were obtained by static and dynamic loading of the greater trochanter, with the bone in slightly different positions. No torsion was involved in the fracture mechanism.

7. Spiral fractures of the shaft were produced by static torsion loading.

8. Transverse fractures of the shaft were produced by cross-bending loads.

9. The "stresscoat" deformation patterns obtained in the fractured bones clearly demonstrated that, with the possible exception of the abduction type, each of the various kinds of fractures arose from the failure of the bone as the result of the tensile strain.

10. Contrary to a rather general belief, transverse fractures of the femoral neck are not produced by torsional forces. There is no mechanism in the living body that can produce torsional strain in the femoral neck.

11. Shearing force is also not involved in the fracture mechanism although, depending upon the obliquity of the fracture line, it can be a serious factor in the treatment of such fractures.

12. Spiral fractures of the shaft are merely other examples of the failure of the bone as the result of the tensile strain. They do not arise from shearing stress.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?