This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WILSON, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WILSON, P. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1951;33:307-323.
© 1951 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


FOLLOW-UP STUDY OF THE USE OF REFRIGERATED HOMOGENOUS BONE TRANSPLANTS IN ORTHOPAEDIC OPERATIONS

PHILIP D. WILSON M.D.1

1 Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City

In a study of 214 patients who were subjected to 278 operations in which sterile homogenous bone grafts were used, wound infection occurred in four cases (1.4 per cent.) and there was loss of the grafts in two (0.7 per cent.).

In a follow-up study to determine the final results with respect to healing of the refrigerated homogenous bone grafts, 144 patients were traced who had undergone 179 orthopaedic operations for a large variety of conditions. Considered on a basis of the number of operations, the results were found to be successful in 80 per cent. and unsuccessful in 11 per cent. Fifteen patients (9 per cent.) had undergone operations too recently for a determination of the results. By eliminating four cases in which the failure was unrelated to bone healing, the rate of failure can be lowered to 8 per cent.

This study justified the following conclusions:

1. With careful technique, homogenous bone grafts may he preserved for long periods of time for surgical use.

2. Such grafts are well tolerated by human tissues and the risk of infection is no greater than with autogenous grafts.

3. The healing of such grafts takes place by a process of invasion, absorption, and replacement similar to that of autogenous bone grafts.

4. The results obtained are identical with those from the use of autogenous grafts, except that in some instances the healing appears to be a little slower.

5. The operation of a bone bank is safe and practical. It offers great advantages to the patient and the surgeon from the standpoint of availability, abundance, and the elimination of the necessity of a secondary operation to obtain bone.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?