This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DELORME, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by SHRIBER, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DELORME, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by SHRIBER, W. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1950;32:910-924.
© 1950 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc

INFLUENCE OF PROGRESSIVE-RESISTANCE EXERCISES ON KNEE FUNCTION FOLLOWING FEMORAL FRACTURES

THOMAS L. DELORME 1, FRANCIS E. WEST 1, and WILLIAM J. SHRIBER M.D.1

1 Orthopaedic Section, Gardiner General hospital, Chicago, Illinois

One hundred and fifty-eight soldiers with femoral-shaft fractures and forty-one with condylar fractures treated on the Orthopaedic Service of Gardiner General Hospital were Subjects of an investigation to determine the effectiveness of progressive-resistance exercises in restoring knee function compared with that obtained by less strenuous physical therapeutic methods. Of patients with shaft fractures, eighty-eight received progressive resistance exercises three weeks or more, and seventy did not. Eighteen of the forty-one patients with condylar fractures received progressive-resistance exercises while twenty-three did not. All data were collected immediately before discharge from general hospital care, which in this particular hospital included, in many instances, advanced reconditioning.

Results evaluated objectively provide strong evidence of the therapeutic effectiveness of this exercise technique over less strenuous methods. For optimum results it should be initiated as soon as union permits, and continued until maximum functional gains have been made. With caution, the exercises may be initiated at the end of the immobilization period. Progressive-resistance exercises are advocated as an adjunct to more conservative therapeutic procedures, for, when integrated properly in the rehabilitation period, a superior result will usually be obtained. It should replace the less strenuous exercises which are erroneously employed at this phase of recovery. Passive and light-resistance exercises are of little or no value in the reestablishment of normal muscle bulk and strength without which rehabilitation of a fractured femur, or any other fracture for that matter, is incomplete.

The results of the study clearly indicate that as a whole, knee function, following battle-sustained fractures of the femur treated by the methods described, is not good and leaves much to be desired. The results, even in the simple, uncomplicated femoral fractures, should stimulate more interest in techniques, such as the intramedullary fixation, which would permit early ambulation to preserve knee-joint motion.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ptjournalHome page
L. L Andersen, S P. Magnusson, M. Nielsen, J. Haleem, K. Poulsen, and P. Aagaard
Neuromuscular Activation in Conventional Therapeutic Exercises and Heavy Resistance Exercises: Implications for Rehabilitation
Physical Therapy, May 1, 2006; 86(5): 683 - 697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
D. A. Galvao and R. U. Newton
Review of Exercise Intervention Studies in Cancer Patients
J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2005; 23(4): 899 - 909.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]