This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KITE, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KITE, J. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1950;32:500-506.
© 1950 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


CONGENITAL METATARSUS VARUS

Report of 300 Cases

J. HIRAM KITE M.D.1

1 Scottish Rite Hospital for Crippled Children, Dectur

Congenital metatarsus varus may be thought of as being "a third of a club foot". The condition has been occurring with increasing frequency during the last few years. The adduction and inversion of the fore part of the foot, which are frequently overlooked at birth, become more marked during the first few months of life, due to the strong pull of the anterior tibial muscle.

Cases of metatarsus varus have been divided info two groups. The smaller group, consisting of more severe cases with a strong hereditary tendency and associated congenital deformities, are most resistant to treatment. The patients in the larger group show no hereditary tendency or allied deformities, other than those associated with the feet, and have no fixed deformity of the heel. They respond readily to treatment and show little tendency to recurrence. This group is increasing.

Six criteria are necessary to make the diagnosis. From the functional viewpoint, the foot is always pulled in and up; and from the structural viewpoint, there is adduction and inversion of the fore part of the foot, a higher arch than normal, a prominence on the lateral border of the foot, and greater rigidity of the foot, which cannot be abducted past the midline.

Three hundred cases have been studied. The treatment has been by casts and wedgings, similar to those used for the correction of the adduction deformity in club-foot, care being taken not to produce a flat-foot deformity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. M. HUBBARD, R. S. DAVIDSON, J. S. MEYER, and S. MAHBOUBI
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skewfoot
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 1996; 78(3): 389 - 97.
[Abstract] [Full Text]